CRT 205 WEEK THREE (3) COMPLETE . - 9213

Solution Posted by
Solution Detail
Price: $7.00
  • From: ,
  • Posted on: Fri 27 Apr, 2012
  • Request id: None
  • Purchased: 0 time(s)
  • Average Rating: No rating
Request Description

Week Three

 

Credibility

 

·         Evaluate the credibility of arguments.

·         Assess the credibility of media and advertising claims.

 

Course Assignments

 

1.     CheckPoint: Argument Credibility

 

·         Locate a link to an online video or print news story from your favorite online news source. Your choice of source may range from a major news network to a small opinion magazine, but should not include YouTube or Google VideoTM video search. Select a story in which claims are made, and note the story title and source name. If you cannot obtain a direct link to a video, write a summary of the video’s key points and provide a link to the Web site where you found the clip.

·         Answer the following questions in a 100- to 200-word response:

o    What claims are being made?

o    Do the claims conflict with your personal observations?

o    What background information do you have about the claims?

o    What is the expertise of the author, if any?

o    Is the author biased and untrustworthy, or unbiased and trustworthy?

·         Post your response and the link to your online source.

 

2.     CheckPoint 2: Argument Credibility Peer Review

 

·         Review the Constructive Feedback Tutorial at http://204.17.25.69/AXIA/CRT205/constructive_feedback.html. This tutorial utilizes audio narration and is about 10 minutes in length. A constructive feedback transcript is available.

·         Perform a peer review of a classmate’s CheckPoint Part I response, which your instructor will place in your Individual forum on Day 3.

·         Answer the following questions in a 100- to 200-word response:

o    Do you think your classmate accurately identified the claims? Explain your answer.

o    Your classmate has compared the claims against his or her personal observations; how do the claims agree or conflict with your own personal observations? How are the observations made by you and your classmate the same or different?

o    Your classmate has compared the claims against his or her background information; how do the claims agree or conflict with your own background information? How are the background analyses of you and your classmate the same or different?

o    Do you think your classmate made an accurate judgment about the author’s bias or trustworthiness? Explain your answer.

o    Which concepts from the feedback tutorial did you use to conduct this peer review?

·         Post your answers and your classmate’s CheckPoint Part 1 online news source and response.

 

3.     Assignment: Analyzing Credibility

 

·         Resources: Giuliani Remembers 9/11” news clip and video ads located at one of the links listed below. The CNN Pipeline news clip is located on the Materials tab of your student Web site for Week Three.

·      

Solution Description

CRT 205 WEEK

Attachments
Week 3 Assignment Analyzing Credibility.doc
Week 3 Assignme...
Week 3 CheckPoint 1 Argument Credibility.doc
Week 3 CheckPoi...
Week 3 CheckPoint 2 Argument Credibility Peer Review.doc
Week 3 CheckPoi...