# CRT 205 Week 6 DQ 2 - 7511

Solution Posted by

## 3number

Rating : (2)F
Solution Detail
Price: \$2.00
• From: ,
• Posted on: Wed 11 Apr, 2012
• Request id: None
• Purchased: 0 time(s)
• Average Rating: No rating
Request Description

I believe that this example requires inductive logic because even though the child says that she did not steal the cookies because her hands are not dirty, she very well could of. It is possible that she stole the cookies using a napkin to grab them. I believe the premises in this example is that there is that the child claims there is no chocolate on hers hands for an argument that she did not steal the cookies, so that means a premises is stated. The conclusion is that the child did not steal the cookies because she states her hands are not stained. I do not believe this is a good argument because if she took the cookies, there is a numerous amount of ways, she could have covered it up.

Solution Description

I believe that this example requires inductive logic because even though the child say