CEO Compensation at Qwest (Graded A+) - use as a guide only - 34066

Solution Posted by


Rating : (81)A
Solution Detail
Price: $11.00
  • From: Business,
  • Posted on: Wed 27 Nov, 2013
  • Request id: None
  • Purchased: 0 time(s)
  • Average Rating: No rating
Request Description

CEO Compensation at Qwest

In April 2002, despite posting a net loss of $4 billion for the previous year and being strained by a $25 billion debt, Qwest Communications awarded its CEO, Joseph Nacchio, a yearly compensation and benefits package of $217.3 million, including pay and potential gains from stock option grants. At the time of this writing, Qwest shares were 83 percent off their 52-week high.

In 2001 Nacchio received a salary of almost 1.2 million, a 27 percent increase over 2000, but his bonus dropped 32 percent to 1.5 million. In addition, he obtained at least $74.5 million from exercising stock options and long-term incentive pay of $24.4 million. Other compensations of $229,705 included a $136,745 allocation for use of corporate aircraft. However, stock options, with a potential future value of $115.6 million, became worthless by September 2002, according to the Investor Responsibility Research Center, since Qwest’s share price dropped lower than the $16.81 exercise price of the options. So, as of September 2002, the actual worth of the compensation and benefits package for the year was approximately $101.7 million.

According to the Investor Responsibility Research Center, this was one of the top pay packages for 2001, based on an analysis of CEO pay at 267 companies with revenue of $1 billion or more. A Qwest spokesperson, however, said that Nacchio’s pay is on a scale with other firms trying to retain officers and that Qwest has outperformed many competitors. (See USA TODAY, April 10, 2002.)

In 2002, despite a 30-month-long stock market slump, there appeared to remain a wide disjuncture between CEO pay and company performance. There was at the time little evidence of substantial CEO-pay-package cuts even in companies that performed poorly. Executive salaries generally rose, despite an economic climate of low stock prices and greater scrutiny of directors and executives as a result of corporate financial and fraud scandals. While average worker salaries were rising just above 3.6 percent, many CEOs were receiving double-digit salary increases, bonuses, stock option grants potentially worth millions, and benefits such as company-owned apartments. (See USA TODAY, September 30, 2002.)


1.      Is Joseph Nacchio’s yearly compensation and benefits package of $217.3 million fair, unfair, or neither fair nor unfair?

2.      As a matter of fairness, should a CEO’s pay be reduced when: (a) other employees are forced to take a reduction or (b) when the company’s profit margin is lower than anticipated under the society’s economic condition?

3.      As a matter of fairness, should the salaries of American CEOs be substantially reduced below their present level? If so, who should be authorized to lower the salary?

Solution Description


CEO Compensation at Qwest.docx
CEO Compensatio...