unit 3 discussion for profdavid - 77735

Request Posted by
adam2296

adam2296

Rating : No Rating
Earned: $0
Request Detail
Price: $10
  • From: Economics, Microeconomics
  • Due on: Wed 09 Sep, 2015 (05:00pm)
  • Asked on: Mon 07 Sep, 2015
  • Due date has passed, but you can still Post Solution.
Description

We are all affected by externalities. Environmentalists would love to see any type of pollution banned completely. Do you agree with them? Or do you side with most economists, who argue that some pollution is better for society than none at all. To take this one step further, Phil Knight, as well as many others, has major production/manufacturing facilities located in some of the poorest regions of the world. Ever wonder why? Have you ever bought a NIKE article? Would you again and what do you say to those who disagree with you? Explain your answer carefully.

2 Solution for unit 3 discussion for profdavid
Title Price Category solution By purchased  
Pollution.....................
$12.00 Economics, Microeconomics profdavid 1 time(s)
Enviromentalists verses economists
$10.00 no category annmum1994 0 time(s)
Please Login or Register to Submit the Solution for the Request