(This was a made up case that I sent you last time, just a different assignment)
Write 300-word proposal that includes sentencing arguments formulated from the defense perspective of MARYLAND STATE, for all 4 charges in which the defendant was found to be guilty.
Ruling on State v. Stu Dents
In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the jury finds the defendant guilty of the following:
For the charge of burglary, the defendant is not guilty due to lack of evidence that the victim’s possessions were taken without her permission.
Use this information as the basis for your sentencing proposal.
Include the specific sentence for each charge (based on MARYLAND state laws), as well as the desired outcome of each punishment. (In other words, why should the court sentence this way?)
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
|$12.00||Law, Criminal Justice||harshsingrodia||1 time(s)|